Skip to main content

Christmas pudding

Here is an easy verision of the elaborate Christmas pudding:

Prep: 20-25 minutes
Cook: 8 hours total
Makes: 10-12 servings
§ 7 cups mixed dried fruit of your choice*(raisins, currants, sultans, figs, prunes, apricots, cherry, apple, dates..) of which ¼ must be candied citrus peel, chopped
§ ½ cup rum or brandy
§ 1/3 cup orange juice
§ 1/3 cup grated apple
§ 1tsp orange zest
§ 1tsp lemon zest
§ 225g cold butter, cut up into tiny cubes
§ 1 ¼ cup soft brown sugar
§ 3 eggs, lightly beaten
§ 1tsp baking powder
§ ¼ tsp ground dalchini (cinnamon)
§ ¼ tsp ground jaiphal (nutmeg)
§ 100g almonds, blanched and coarsely ground
1. Combine fruit with rum or brandy, juice and zest; cover and let steep overnight.
2. With fork, cream butter and sugar; mix in eggs, baking powder, spices, flour, then breadcrumbs and ground almonds. Batter should drop readily off spoon.
3. Bring a kettle of water to boil. Meanwhile, grease and line a 2 litre pudding basin. Pour in pudding batter, smoothen top till level. Place a secure of greaseproof paper over the basin, then a foil, and secure with string under rim. Make a handle of string attached to two sides of the string securing foil and paper.
4. Sit basin on a triver or upturned saucer in a large lidded pot and pour hot water into pot till it comes halfway up outside of basin. Cover and steam for 6 hours-water should be at a simmer-top up water if necessary. The pudding basin now may be wrapped in a muslin cloth and stored until Christmas.
5. On Christmas day, just before serving lounch, untie pudding and again set to steam for 2 hours.
6. Remove from heat and test with skewer. Let stand for 5 minutes before un mouldintg. If liked, drizzle over 2 tablespoon brandy and set alight to serve.

Comments

Also read

Does India need communal parties?

I think, it was Tan's post on this blog itself, Republic Day Event, where this question was raised. My answer. YES. we need communal parties even in Independent, Secular India. Now let me take you, back to events before 1947. When India was a colony of the British Empire. The congress party, in its attempt to gain momentum for the independence movement, heavily used Hinduism, an example of which is the famous Ganesh Utsav held in Mumbai every year. Who complains? No one. But at that time, due to various policies of the congress, Muslims started feeling alienated. Jinnah, in these times, got stubborn over the need of Pakistan and he did find a lot of supporters. Congress, up till late 1940's never got bothered by it. And why should we? Who complains? No one. But there were repercussions. The way people were butchered and slaughtered during that brief time when India got partitioned, was even worse than a civil war scenario. All in the name of religion. And there indeed was cr...

Debate : Do the ends justify the means...

Note : Give it all a fair thought before you jot down... Flaming and religion-bashing will not be tolerated. Your participation is gladly appreciated. I dunno if you folks remember this incident; a couple of yrs back, the UPSC exam had a question where the emainee had to assert his views on *revolutionary terrorism* initiated by Bhagat Singh. As is typical of the government, hue and cry was not far behind... Anyway, let us look at some facts -   Bhagat Singh was an atheist, considered to be one of the earliest Marxist in India and in line with hi thinking, he renamed the Hindustan Republican Party and called it the Hindustan Socialist Revolutionary Party. Bhagat Finally, awaiting his own execution for the murder of Saunders, Bhagat Singh at the young age of 24 studied Marxism thoroughly and wrote a profound pamphlet “Why I am an Atheist.” which is an ideological statement in itself. The circumstances of his death and execution are worth recounting. Although, Bhagat Singh had a...

Politics - A profession

Note: This article was originally published on 18 March 2009, 01:10 on this blog and has been thoughtfully revised on 30 January 2026, 12:00 noon to reflect fresh insights and updated context. This post is loosely inspired by the  TATA Tea a d  where this politician goes to ask for votes and a voter asks him for his qualification and work experience the the important 'job' that he is embarking upon. The politician laughs at the voter, asking him what job is the voter referring to. The voter responds, "The job to run the country". Do politicians in other countries view politics as a profession? Or is politics viewed similarly across international boundaries? The best way of course to find out is go to that ever useful tool for professionals - LinkedIn.  Here are the results: Barrack Obama Hillary Clinton Sarah Palin The apparently technologically challenged Senator   John McCain. I also came across many politicians, prime ministers who have LinkedIn profiles. While ...