Skip to main content

Why demonetization turned out to be a dud excercise

The much talked about the decision by Prime Minister Modi to demonetize most of our currency will turn out to be dud as it has drastically failed on its key objective.

The goal

The major goal as announced to invalidate the 1000 and 500 currency was to weed out black money and corruption. A minor aim was to work ahead with the noble idea of the Prime Minister to push for a less cash/ cashless society. 

A major failure

However, the idea failed big time. You go to any bank in India today, ask people who are in the know of things and they will tell you the exact commission being charged by bank staff to convert your cash into a new currency. The commission ranges from 25-35% . If you had 50 lakhs under your mattress, you will still have most of it, before November ends and can shove it back under the mattress. 

But this simple idea came later. First came the usual plain boring ideas. Put money in gold. Clear your past dues in old cash. Pay a commission to money laundering experts. Use other clean accounts like Jan Dhan ones to park money. Many people bought electrical items, at inflated prices which guaranteed them backdated bills. But then came the bright idea. Simply pay the bank people and get direct cash. You go after hours, hand over the money and you will get newly printed fresh notes. Anyone else dropping in the branch will be politely told that 'no cash' is available. 

So hoarding continues. Common people, thinking that Mr. Modi has delivered some master stroke continue to suffer. Big people have banks helping them turn the money white. As I am writing this, some bank officer would be entering my name against the 4000 or 2000 I supposedly exchanged last week, even though I never visited any of the banks. They would be using my ID proofs from my KYC records and happily obliging the rich and mighty. 

No points for guessing then, that the idea has failed. Mr. Modi should understand this and concede defeat. It is no secret that the idea to do with the exchange of currency at banks was done when the government realized that they cannot control the bank staff. One of the major reasons why implementation of this scheme has faced issues is that our banking system is hardly efficient on any given day. You can expect them to extend working hours but not to ramp up their management skills in a day.

I really feel that the idea was not bad. Mr. Modi should be given due credit for pro-activeness. All those criticizing his moves have failed to offer one better alternative. While you will find pages full of criticism, no one has come with a better idea. Me neither. That it didn't work should not be a reason enough to bad name our Prime Minister. He had over confidence in our rotting banking structure. He believed them when the bankers said the bad loans was just due to the economic environment and it not their own mess. He should learn from this and move on.

The minor goal, however is looking doable. His idea of less cash society is very logical. Just to say that we are a cash economy and its working just fine is a wrong conception. If we need to grow, we need to reform. And a less cash society is a major reform. But his target is just the middle class and lower middle class. The others have already got fresh cash from the bank. Still, digital currency is gaining ground and with the shortage of cash (an artificial shortage I must say), a rapid awareness is happening regarding the use of digital currency. 

Not all is lost. The government can humbly accept the little gains it has made and accept that most of the black money it wished to target is gone, poof! It has turned into flats, golds, new currency, new television sets etc. The excessive liquidity the banks have gained are also losses as it will help them generate more NPAs or bad loans. I think it has already accepted defeat with the sloppy 50% tax scheme. The income declaration scheme which ended in September had 45% charge for black money. Now they want 50%. Then why the whole circus of banning notes?

Hence,  push towards digital currency will remain the most notable achievement of an otherwise dud activity which might not even recover its return on investment. That and the little bit of fake currency which is being now weeded out.

Comments

Also read

Cutting people off isn’t strength—It is a trauma response

Your ability to cut people off and self-isolate is not a skill you should be proud of—It is a trauma response Cutting people off and self-isolating may feel like a protective shield, but it is often rooted in unresolved or unhealed trauma and an inability to depend on others. While these behaviors seem like self-preservation, they end up reinforcing isolation and blocking meaningful connections. Confronting these patterns, seeking therapy, and nurturing supportive relationships can help break this unhealthy cycle. Plus, a simple act like planting a jasmine plant can symbolise the start of your journey towards emotional healing. Why do we cut people off and isolate? If you’re someone who prides themselves on “cutting people off” or keeping a tight circle, you might believe it’s a skill—a way to protect yourself from betrayal, hurt, or unnecessary drama. I get it. I’ve been there, too. But here’s the thing: this ability to isolate yourself is not as empowering as it may seem. In fact, i...

The Camel Club by David Baldacci

A twisty conspiracy, a vigilante group, and a world-shaking terrorist plot—David Baldacci’s The Camel Club delivers intrigue, tension, and surprises. This review explores its highs, lows, and what makes it a must-read. Also, don’t miss recommendations for five thrilling reads to curl up with this December. What Makes The Camel Club A Gripping read? David Baldacci’s The Camel Club is a masterclass in blending suspense, action, and political intrigue. Set in the heart of Washington, D.C., the story follows Oliver Stone and his ragtag group of conspiracy theorists. They witness a chilling murder, setting off a chain reaction that reaches the corridors of power. Alongside Secret Service agent Alex Ford and intelligence chief Carter Gray, we’re drawn into a labyrinth of plots within plots. Who Are The Camel Club, and Why should You Care? The titular club is a quirky mix of outcasts, each bringing unique skills to the table. At the centre is Oliver Stone, an enigmatic man with a shadowy p...

Who the F Are You? by Harinder Singh Pelia — A sharp, kind kick to become unignorable | Book review

In this impatiently kind review I walk you through Harinder Singh Pelia's Who the F Are You?  a short practical guide to finding your unfair advantage and making it impossible to ignore. The book pairs a Minimum Viable Self framework with bite sized exercises and honest case studies. If you want clarity without theatre, this book gives you a plan. Have you ever felt invisible despite working hard? What is the book about in a few lines? The book's central promise is simple: find your unfair advantage, sharpen it and make it impossible to ignore. Pelia lays out a five step process built around the Minimum Viable Self framework. Rather than offering lofty pep talk, the book gives short exercises, prototypes and feedback loops so readers can test how they show up. It is candid, occasionally blunt, and emphatically practical. Harinder Singh Pelia’s Who the F Are You?  was published in 2025 by Penguin, the hardback spans 206 pages and wears its intent on its sleeve. The co...