Is your closest friendship built on trust or convenience? A review of Worst Idea Ever by Jane Fallon
Have you ever stayed in a friendship simply because walking away felt harder?
You know that uncomfortable feeling when you realise a friendship no longer nourishes you, yet you keep showing up anyway. Not because it brings joy, but because history exists, routines are set, and absence would require uncomfortable explanations. Jane Fallon’s Worst Idea Ever taps directly into that quiet, relatable discomfort. It asks a question many of us avoid asking ourselves. Are we friends because we care, or because we always have been?
Published in 2021 by Penguin Books Ltd and stretching across 400 pages, Worst Idea Ever positions itself as a sharp,perceptive exploration of female friendship in the digital age. Fallon, already known as the so called queen of the revenge novel according to Heat, blends humour with psychological tension. The premise promises insight into jealousy, insecurity, and the blurred lines between kindness and control. The execution, however, is more complicated.
This was my first encounter with Jane Fallon’s fiction, recommended by an acquaintance who assured me it was unputdownable. What I found instead was a wicked, toxic story about jealousy, insecurities, and friendships built more on convenience of proximity than emotional substance. There are moments of sharp observation and uncomfortable truth. There are also long stretches where the story drags, padded with lifestyle details that add bulk but little depth.
If you have ever felt exhausted by a friend who resents your success while feeding off it, or if you have ever softened your achievements to protect someone else’s fragile ego, this book will feel painfully familiar. Whether that familiarity makes it compelling or frustrating depends on your tolerance for repetition and emotional circularity.
What is Worst Idea Ever really about at first glance?
At its core, Worst Idea Ever is a contemporary British chiclit novel with psychological undertones. The story centres on two women, Georgia and Lydia, who describe themselves as best friends, almost sisters. They live close, share history, and know each other’s routines intimately. On the surface, theirs is the kind of friendship society often idealises. Long standing, loyal, and ever present.
Georgia is professionally successful, comfortably married, and financially secure. Lydia, on the other hand, struggles. When Lydia launches an online business that fails to gain traction, Georgia feels a mix of pity, guilt, and superiority. She wants to help but knows Lydia would never accept charity openly. This imbalance becomes the emotional engine of the novel.
The book falls squarely within the genre of friendship driven women’s fiction, marketed alongside titles that explore revenge, rivalry, and emotional sabotage. Reader reviews, however, paint a more divided picture. According to Goodreads data available in 2025, the novel maintains an average rating hovering around 3.6 out of 5, suggesting admiration mixed with disappointment.
Before turning the first page, you expect wit, tension, and emotional complexity. What you may not expect is just how much narrative space is devoted to wine soaked evenings, fashionable London interiors, and internal monologues that circle the same emotional drain repeatedly. The promise is compelling. The delivery is uneven.
How does a fake Twitter account become the catalyst for everything?
The inciting incident of Worst Idea Ever is deceptively small. Lydia’s online business struggles to attract customers, likes, or validation. Georgia, watching from a distance, feels sorry for her friend. This pity is not pure. It carries the weight of comparison and the quiet relief of being the more successful one. Lydia is prickly, proud, and deeply sensitive. Offering direct help would wound her pride.
So Georgia does what many modern friendships enable. She helps anonymously. She creates a fake Twitter account named Patricia and begins interacting with Lydia online as a supportive stranger. At first, this seems harmless. Encouraging comments. Positive engagement. A digital cheerleader boosting Lydia’s morale without threatening her independence.
The trouble begins when Lydia responds not just with gratitude but with emotional intimacy. She starts confiding in Patricia. She shares doubts, resentments, and opinions she never voices to Georgia herself. Slowly, the balance of the friendship shifts. Georgia finds herself learning things about Lydia she never knew, while Lydia feels increasingly understood by someone who does not exist.
This dynamic mirrors a broader truth about online spaces. According to a 2023 study by the Pew Research Center, over 40 percent of adults reported feeling more comfortable sharing personal struggles online than with close friends. Fallon uses this reality effectively, showing how digital anonymity can encourage honesty while eroding real world trust.
Georgia knows she should reveal the truth. Every message deepens the lie. Yet she continues, justifying her behaviour as kindness. This is where the novel is at its sharpest. It exposes how good intentions often mask control, how helping can become a way of maintaining emotional dominance.
Is this a story about friendship or about insecurity wearing a friendly mask?
More than anything else, Worst Idea Ever is a study of insecurity. It presents friendship not as a stable emotional bond but as a fragile ecosystem where power, envy, and validation constantly shift. Georgia’s success is not just a source of pride. It is also a burden she feels compelled to minimise around Lydia.
Lydia resents Georgia’s achievements. This resentment is never fully owned. Instead, it leaks out through sarcasm, passive aggression, and emotional withdrawal. Georgia responds by downplaying her wins, apologising for her happiness, and eventually creating Patricia. The friendship survives not because it is healthy, but because it is familiar.
This reflects a painful truth about many adult friendships. Research published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships suggests that long term friendships often persist due to proximity and shared history rather than ongoing emotional satisfaction. Fallon’s novel illustrates this beautifully, even if she overstays the point.
The book also echoes themes explored in reflective essays like driving yourself away from emotional well being, where slow self erosion occurs not through dramatic conflict but through repeated small compromises. Georgia’s biggest mistake is not the fake account. It is staying in a friendship that requires constant emotional self editing.
How does jealousy quietly poison long term friendships?
Jealousy in Worst Idea Ever is not loud. It does not arrive shouting or throwing plates. It arrives politely, wearing concern, wrapped in questions that sound like care. Lydia’s jealousy of Georgia’s success is subtle yet relentless. It shows up in eye rolls, in jokes that land a second too late, in moments where congratulations feel forced. You sense it as a reader long before it is acknowledged on the page.
Georgia, meanwhile, carries her own quieter jealousy. She envies Lydia’s ability to be openly needy, to fail without the weight of expectation. Success isolates Georgia. It forces her to censor herself, to dim her joy so Lydia does not feel small. Over time, this emotional editing becomes exhausting. The friendship turns into a performance rather than a refuge.
Fallon captures something painfully real here. According to a 2022 YouGov survey conducted in the UK, nearly 37 percent of women admitted to downplaying personal success around friends to avoid discomfort or resentment. This statistic breathes life into Georgia’s behaviour. You recognise it because you may have done it yourself.
Yet the book returns to this dynamic so often that the insight begins to feel diluted. Scenes repeat the same emotional beat without advancing it. Jealousy becomes less a revelation and more a loop, trapping both characters and readers alike.
Why does convenience often replace genuine emotional intimacy?
One of the most uncomfortable truths in Worst Idea Ever is that Georgia and Lydia might not actually like each other anymore. They tolerate each other. They rely on shared history. They live close, know each other’s families, and occupy the same social orbit. That proximity creates the illusion of closeness.
Fallon shows how convenience can masquerade as loyalty. Georgia stays because leaving would feel cruel. Lydia stays because Georgia is useful. Neither stays because the friendship brings peace. This is not a dramatic rupture. It is a slow emotional erosion, similar to habits we form around food that comforts but does not nourish, like returning to a bowl of something warm and familiar even when it no longer satisfies. In a strange way, the dynamic mirrors the quiet comfort rituals described in reflective lifestyle writing such as this piece on American bean soup, where familiarity soothes even when depth is missing.
You begin to understand that the real tragedy is not betrayal. It is stagnation. These women are frozen in roles they outgrew years ago, afraid that growth would require separation.
What does the book say about female success and self censorship?
Georgia’s success should be empowering. Instead, it becomes something she apologises for. She constantly softens her achievements, disguises pride as embarrassment, and reframes wins as accidents. Fallon exposes the social discomfort many women feel around ambition, especially when those closest to them are struggling.
This theme is one of the book’s strongest contributions. Fallon does not romanticise success. She shows its isolating side. Georgia moans about everything, yet also brags endlessly, a contradiction that becomes tiring but also revealing. She wants recognition without consequence, validation without envy.
The emotional truth here is sharp. The narrative execution, however, suffers from repetition. The point is made early. It does not need hundreds of pages to land.
Is Georgia a sympathetic narrator or an exhausting one?
Georgia is an annoying protagonist. She complains constantly. She catalogues her achievements while pretending they are burdens. She positions herself as generous while controlling the narrative. And yet, she is recognisable. That is what makes her so uncomfortable to read.
You get tired of Georgia. Tired of her self awareness that never leads to self correction. Tired of her endless internal debates that result in the same decision. She knows creating Patricia is wrong. She knows continuing the lie is worse. She does it anyway. Again and again.
Fallon likely intends this frustration. Georgia is not meant to be admirable. She is meant to be human. Still, spending 400 pages inside her head feels excessive. The story could have been half the size and twice as effective. The fluff dulls the emotional impact.
There are moments when Georgia’s vulnerability shines through. When she questions whether anyone truly knows her. When she fears losing both her marriage and her friend. These moments remind you why you kept reading.
Is Lydia misunderstood or simply unlikeable?
Lydia is harder to defend. She resents Georgia’s success openly and privately. She frames herself as perpetually unlucky, a victim of circumstances rather than choices. Her pride prevents growth. Her insecurity poisons gratitude.
Unlike Georgia, Lydia rarely reflects. She reacts. She takes. She confides in Patricia because Patricia does not challenge her. This makes Lydia deeply unlikeable, yet painfully real. We all know someone who feeds on sympathy while rejecting solutions.
Fallon does not soften Lydia. That honesty is refreshing. What is missing is depth. Lydia’s bitterness is explained but rarely explored. You understand why she feels small, but you never feel invited into her inner world fully.
Do the male characters feel real or unrealistically patient?
The men in Worst Idea Ever are portrayed as saints. They listen endlessly. They forgive easily. They absorb emotional fallout without complaint. While it is refreshing to see supportive male partners, the portrayal feels idealised.
These characters exist largely to stabilise the chaos created by Georgia and Lydia. They are emotional furniture rather than fully realised people. Their patience highlights the women’s dysfunction, but it also reduces narrative tension.
Why is Igor the dog the most memorable presence?
Igor the dog is delightful. He does almost nothing. And yet, he offers more relief than most human characters. This says less about Igor and more about the book. When a dog becomes the emotional highlight, it suggests the human relationships needed sharper writing.
Does the writing comfort you or quietly wear you down?
There is a particular tiredness that sets in when a book keeps circling the same emotional drain without offering release. Worst Idea Ever gave me that feeling more than once. Jane Fallon writes with clarity and competence. Her sentences are easy to read. Her dialogue flows naturally. Yet ease is not the same as depth, and comfort is not the same as satisfaction.
Much of the novel is filled with scenes that feel familiar to the point of fatigue. Smart, comfortable Londoners drinking wine on weeknights as if hangovers do not exist. Conversations that start nowhere and end nowhere. Internal monologues that repeat the same anxieties with slightly different wording. These details create atmosphere, yes, but they do little to carry the story forward.
This is where empathy for the reader matters. As you move through page after page, you begin to feel that the author does not trust you to remember emotional beats unless they are restated. Georgia’s guilt. Lydia’s resentment. The imbalance between them. You understood this early. Being reminded of it endlessly does not deepen the insight. It dulls it.
The tragedy is that Fallon clearly understands emotional complexity. When she allows moments to breathe, they land beautifully. When she lets silence do some of the work, the story feels alive. But too often, those moments are buried under excess explanation. The book does not need to prove its intelligence. It already has it.
Does the story earn its 400 pages?
No. This story could have been told in half the space without losing its emotional core. In fact, it might have been stronger. The central conflict is introduced early. The emotional stakes are clear. The outcome feels predictable from a distance.
Several plot deviations add bulk rather than tension. Subplots appear briefly and fade without consequence. Secondary characters drift in and out without leaving much impact. These detours do not deepen character or theme. They simply slow momentum.
Pacing matters because it respects the reader’s time. When a book lingers without purpose, it risks turning insight into irritation. There were moments when I wanted to skim, not because I was disengaged, but because I was ahead of the narrative emotionally.
This sense of emotional overextension connects to a broader truth about modern life. We often overcomplicate things that need clarity, confusing motion with progress. Similar reflections appear in essays about purpose and self direction, such as this exploration of purpose, wealth, and inner alignment, where the idea of doing less but meaning more feels especially relevant. Fallon’s story would have benefited from that restraint.
How effectively does the book use digital anonymity and irony?
The fake Twitter account is the novel’s most effective device. Patricia represents everything Georgia feels she cannot be openly. Supportive without judgement. Honest without consequence. Present without vulnerability. Through Patricia, Fallon explores how digital anonymity removes social friction.
There is a quiet irony in how Lydia feels truly seen by someone who does not exist, while ignoring the friend who stands beside her daily. Fallon captures the emotional distortion of online relationships well. When stakes feel lower, people speak more freely. When identity is hidden, honesty flows.
This dynamic reflects real behaviour. A 2021 study published by the Oxford Internet Institute found that anonymous or semi anonymous platforms increase emotional disclosure by nearly 30 percent compared to face to face interactions. Fallon’s fiction mirrors this reality convincingly.
Where the device falters is duration. The tension peaks early. Maintaining it across hundreds of pages without escalation weakens its impact. The irony remains clever, but it stops evolving.
Which quote captures the emotional heart of the book?
One line that lingers comes from Georgia’s reflection on friendship: “Sometimes knowing someone for years just means you’ve been lying to each other for longer.” It is sharp. It is uncomfortable. It cuts to the heart of the novel’s thesis.
Moments like this show what Worst Idea Ever could have been more often.
Why did critics praise it while readers remained divided?
Critical praise for Worst Idea Ever is easy to understand. Publications like the Daily Mail called it emotionally intelligent and beautifully written. Milly Johnson described it as funny, insightful, sharp, and wicked. These assessments focus on intent and theme.
Readers, however, engage differently. On platforms like Goodreads, five star reviews praise its relatability and emotional tension, while lower ratings criticise pacing and predictability. According to aggregated reader data from 2024, over 28 percent of reviewers mentioned length as their primary complaint. Critics often value concept and commentary. Readers value experience. A book can be smart and still feel like work.
At this point in the story, you may find yourself asking not what will happen next, but when it will finally happen. That question matters. It shapes how you remember a book long after you close it.
If friendship is the theme, which books handle it with more honesty?
Reading Worst Idea Ever inevitably makes you think about other novels that explore friendship with more restraint and emotional payoff. Friendship based chiclit thrives when it balances warmth with truth, humour with accountability. Fallon’s book has the ideas, but not always the discipline.
If you are planning your 2026 reading list and want stories that examine friendships without exhausting you, these titles are worth your time. Each approaches female bonds with nuance, empathy, and narrative control.
- The List of Suspicious Things by Jennie GodfreyA tender exploration of childhood friendship and loyalty, this book understands that silence can be as powerful as confession. It trusts the reader and rewards patience.
- Conversations with Friends by Sally RooneyRooney captures insecurity and intimacy with sharp precision. Her characters are flawed, but the prose never overstays its welcome.
- The Reading List by Sara Nisha AdamsFriendship here grows gently, through shared stories rather than rivalry. It reminds you that connection does not need manipulation to feel meaningful.
- Firefly Lane by Kristin HannahA long term friendship tested by ambition, jealousy, and time. Unlike Fallon’s novel, this one allows its characters to evolve.
The Paper Palace by Miranda Cowley Heller
While broader in scope, its depiction of female bonds is layered and emotionally honest, proving that complexity need not mean clutter.
These books understand one simple rule. Emotional weight increases when unnecessary words fall away.
Who is Jane Fallon beyond this single story?
Jane Fallon is a multi award winning television producer whose career includes influential British shows such as This Life, Teachers, and 20 Things to Do Before You’re 30. Her background in television explains her strong grasp of dialogue and pacing within individual scenes.
Her debut novel, Getting Rid of Matthew, published in 2007, became a Sunday Times Top Ten Bestseller. Subsequent novels including Got You Back, Foursome, The Ugly Sister, Skeletons, Strictly Between Us, My Sweet Revenge, Faking Friends, and Tell Me a Secret cemented her reputation as a writer of revenge driven, relationship focused fiction.
This was my first Jane Fallon book, read on recommendation. While I admire her observational skills, this novel did not inspire me to immediately reach for another. That said, long time fans may find it aligns comfortably with her established voice.
Where does Worst Idea Ever fall noticeably short?
The most obvious shortcoming is restraint. The story lacks editorial discipline. Emotional points are repeated rather than sharpened. The narrative assumes that more words equal more depth, which is rarely true.
Clichés appear frequently. You can see plot turns coming from a distance. The fake account storyline holds no genuine surprises once established. Instead of escalating tension, the book sustains it at the same level until fatigue sets in.
There is also a missed opportunity to interrogate accountability. Georgia’s actions have consequences, but they feel muted. Lydia’s bitterness is explained, but not challenged. The book observes dysfunction but stops short of demanding growth.
Even the setting, while vivid, becomes monotonous. The familiar rhythm of London life, wine nights, and comfortable privilege begins to feel like filler rather than texture.
Should you read Worst Idea Ever or leave it on the shelf?
If you enjoy psychologically driven friendship dramas and do not mind a slow pace, you may find value here. The themes are relatable. The observations are often sharp. There are moments when Fallon’s insight cuts close to home.
If, however, you value narrative efficiency and emotional evolution, this book may test your patience. It asks you to stay longer than necessary without offering enough new perspective in return.
This is not a bad book. It is an overextended one.
What should you ask yourself after turning the final page?
Would you recognise if a friendship in your life had become transactional rather than nourishing? Would you have the courage to step away, or would you create your own version of Patricia to keep things comfortable?
These questions linger longer than the plot itself. Perhaps that is the book’s quiet success.
I would love to know what you are currently reading and whether this book resonated or irritated you. Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Frequently asked questions readers often have?
What stays with you once the story ends?
What lingers is not the plot, but the discomfort. The recognition of friendships maintained out of obligation. The exhaustion of emotional imbalance. The quiet knowledge that kindness, when mixed with control, can cause harm.
Worst Idea Ever is a mirror. Whether you appreciate what it reflects depends on how willing you are to sit with that discomfort.
Who is Tushar Mangl ?
Tushar Mangl writes on books, investments, business, mental health, food, vastu, leisure, and a greener, better society. Speaker and author of Ardika.
For more inspiring insights, subscribe to the YouTube Channel at Tushar Mangl.
Comments