Skip to main content

The bookizie Tag

Wednesday,may 28,2008,5.10 pm

Ohk,am creating this tag,inspired by a post i read on jabberwocky,its just been mildly inspired.
lets see the rules first
*Bold the ones you've read
*Italicize the ones you want to read
*leave blank the ones that you aren't interested in.
* Add any 5 titles of your choice in this list,before you pass on the tag



  1. Agatha Christie - Sad Cypress
  2. Ayn rand - The fountainhead
  3. Ayn rand - Atlas shrugged
  4. Anurag Mathur - The inscrutable Americans
  5. Arthur Hailey- Hotel
  6. Alistair maclean - The guns of navarone
  7. Anne frank- The diary of a young girl
  8. Danielle Steel - Full circle
  9. Enid Blyton - the famous five series
  10. Jeffery Archer - Not a penny more and not a penny less
  11. Jackie collins - Hollywood wives
  12. James Hadley Chase - An ear to the ground
  13. Ken follet - A place called freedom
  14. Mario Puzo - the Godfather
  15. Micheal Crichton - Airframe
  16. Mills and boons - Any book or series- mention it
  17. Paulo Coelho - The alchemist
  18. Robert Ludlum - Trevayne
  19. Sidney Sheldon - The sands of time
  20. Suketu Mehta - The maximum city
  21. Thomas Hardy - Far from the madding crowd
  22. Shrimad Bhagavad Gita
  23. Dan Brown - The deception point
  24. Emily Bronte- Wuthering heights
  25. Eric Segal - The Class
  26. Mulk raj Anand - Coolie
  27. R.K. Narayan - The English teacher
  28. J.k. Rowling - The Potter series
  29. Sidney Sheldon - A stranger in the mirror
  30. Agatha Christie - Curtain[ Poirot's last case]

Ok, so we can tag as many people we like.Four people who have already done this are :-

Shaista,SUkanaya ,Pankhuri and kash. Members and readers are requested to this tag either on thier personal blog or this blog itself.Also compare up your answers with these people who have done this,and offer suggestions.

Jai Sri Ram !!!
Labels:

Comments

wild iris said…
yeah, i saw this tag on jabberwocky too. I'll take it.
June 13, 2008 at 2:55 PM
wild iris said…
but hey, you haven't made any of them bold or italicized... :S
June 13, 2008 at 2:58 PM
Tshhar Mangal said…
Oh,I made the list myself.
SO its obvious i have read many of them.
Not much fun doing it
:-)
June 13, 2008 at 3:29 PM
Post a Comment

Also read

Punjab’s stilt-plus-four real estate rule 2025: Game changer or urban chaos? | circle rate hike explained

When the Punjab Cabinet approved the Unified Building Rules 2025, allowing stilt-plus-four floor construction across 40-ft-wide roads, it sparked both celebration and anxiety. For homeowners, it opened a new chapter of vertical prosperity. For urban planners, it may have unlocked Pandora’s box. Add to that a steep rise in circle rates up to 67% in Mohali and you have the perfect cocktail for a cityscape revolution. Is Punjab’s stilt-plus-four policy a game changer or a warning sign for urban chaos? Punjab’s 2025 building rule reforms are rewriting its urban DNA. With stilt-plus-four floors now permitted on 250 sq yd plots and higher circle rates in force, Punjab’s real estate market is at a crossroads. Is this the dawn of new opportunities or the slow death of livable cities? The answer lies somewhere between ambition and chaos. Urban transformation often begins with good intentions and ends in gridlocks. Punjab’s new stilt-plus-four policy and simultaneous circle rate hike hav...
Post a Comment
Read more

Legions of Slave Women in the Mahabharata

Awakening to the Bhagavad Gita (series) - 1 For, taking refuge in Me, they also, who, O Arjuna, may be of sinful birth— women, Vaisyas as well as Sudras—attain the Supreme Goal! How much more easily then the holy Brahmins and devoted royal saints (attain the goal); having obtained this impermanent and unhappy world, do thou worship Me. The Bhagavad Gita, Chap 9, Ver 32, 33 So women are of sinful birth! As well as all kinds of workers, business men, entrepreneurs, most of the general population. The only people of virtuous births are priests — Brahmins — and royal saints, meaning saintly royals, meaning noble Kshatriyas. No wonder then that Yudhishthira — to reinstate whom this whole Mahabharata war has been fought — maintained hundreds of thousands of slave women! Take that number again: hundreds of thousands! He had so much gold, he could afford to. He had so much virtue, but he wanted more! Let's find the facts and figures from Draupadi's own wo...
15 comments
Read more

Cutting people off isn’t strength—It is a trauma response

Your ability to cut people off and self-isolate is not a skill you should be proud of—It is a trauma response Cutting people off and self-isolating may feel like a protective shield, but it is often rooted in unresolved or unhealed trauma and an inability to depend on others. While these behaviors seem like self-preservation, they end up reinforcing isolation and blocking meaningful connections. Confronting these patterns, seeking therapy, and nurturing supportive relationships can help break this unhealthy cycle. Plus, a simple act like planting a jasmine plant can symbolise the start of your journey towards emotional healing. Why do we cut people off and isolate? If you’re someone who prides themselves on “cutting people off” or keeping a tight circle, you might believe it’s a skill—a way to protect yourself from betrayal, hurt, or unnecessary drama. I get it. I’ve been there, too. But here’s the thing: this ability to isolate yourself is not as empowering as it may seem. In fact, i...
1 comment
Read more