Skip to main content

4 thoughts on Gandhi’s Satyagraha and Non-Violence


While we are all are poised to celebrate Republic Day, it is the apt occasion to write about one of its most admired heroes without whose contribution the India could never become free and no colonized country become a republic in its true sense. However, there were, and still are many opponents of Gandhi who even tried to prove that the non-violence, as a method to fight British empire, was not only inappropriate but a downright blunder. Many people had doubts regarding Satyagraha or non-violence during Gandhi’s times. In today’s times of military trials, it is but natural to have doubts regarding the relevance of non-violence. So, let us understand the full import of Gandhi’s Satyagraha, what it was not, and relevance in today’s time:

Myth: Satyagraha was for weak
It was the strongest weapon used against violent forces. He famously believed “Satyagraha is the vindication of truth not by infliction of suffering on the opponent but on oneself.” In fact, the very concept of Satyagraha breaks the myth that non-violence is an excuse for the coward. Nay, it even sketches a line between the active practitioners of non-violence and nonchalant, passive cowards. For, it is not the work of passive cowards to continue his fight for truth in the face of violent persecution, without raising a hand and without stopping a step. Satyagrahis would not just offer cosmetic sympathy. Apart from their active struggle against oppression, Satyagrahis would also actively participate in removing the social evils like alcoholism and untouchability and also achieved considerable positive results and support.

Truth: Satyagraha strengthened women
While the feeling of patriotism was equally shared by both men and women, the latter generally refrained from participating actively against the colonialists. Even those who were interested in participating in the struggle against freedom were restrained by social customs and more importantly barbaric nature of the oppressors. However, Gandhi’s non-violent Satyagraha offered them a legitimate, acceptable means to actively stand against injustice and persecution. The movement demanded community participation and thus offered communal support, more safety and encouraged positive peer pressure. Beside’s Gandhi’s liberal thoughts that broke the barriers of caste, creed and gender further encouraged them to come ahead and fight against oppression. Hence Satyagraha played a vital role in strengthening women.

Misconception: Non-violence is not relevant anymore
If the Gandhi’s non-violence was irrelevant in today’s context the militant countries of the world would have been ruling over it. On the contrary, many of them are largely being deserted by their own inhabitants. The victory fetched by bloody wars has failed miserably in bringing about a long-lasting peace. In fact, the reason lies in its very own structure. The violence is based on the foundation of fear. The victory brought about by violence is short lived and starts a vicious cycle of hatred. The defeated keeps on planning for revenging the defeat while the victor is more worried on strengthening the army to avoid such attacks rather than enjoying the victory. Fundamentally both of them lose.
Non-violence, on the contrary, focuses at burning away the pride and cruelty and rekindling the natural kindness. Hence there is no loser in that war. The Satyagrahi gains his self-respect while the opponent also regains the precious natural gift of humanity: Kindness.

Observation: Vital role of Non-Violence in development of civilization

Upon analyzing the human civilization we would observe that the most primitive ancestors of human were wandering hunters. Gradually they started farming. So, they evolved from being violent to many peaceful creatures (vegetable eaters). More interestingly, only after they started farming they finally settled down, villages were formed gradually and finally, the culture flourished. So, we see that for any kind of steady cultural development, non-violence is the key element. Hence, non-violence also offers a fertile ground for scientific, cultural and artistic development. 

Jitendra is a creative writer and a peaceful soul. Writing has not just his profession or passion. He admires writing for its therapeutic effects on the mind. He loves to visit the abandoned forts and national parks when he is not writing. He can be reached at worldofwords1970@gmail.com
__________

For guest article submissions at this website, kindly get in touch at orangy [dot] in @ Gmail [dot]com

Comments

Also read

Cutting people off isn’t strength—It is a trauma response

Your ability to cut people off and self-isolate is not a skill you should be proud of—It is a trauma response Cutting people off and self-isolating may feel like a protective shield, but it is often rooted in unresolved or unhealed trauma and an inability to depend on others. While these behaviors seem like self-preservation, they end up reinforcing isolation and blocking meaningful connections. Confronting these patterns, seeking therapy, and nurturing supportive relationships can help break this unhealthy cycle. Plus, a simple act like planting a jasmine plant can symbolise the start of your journey towards emotional healing. Why do we cut people off and isolate? If you’re someone who prides themselves on “cutting people off” or keeping a tight circle, you might believe it’s a skill—a way to protect yourself from betrayal, hurt, or unnecessary drama. I get it. I’ve been there, too. But here’s the thing: this ability to isolate yourself is not as empowering as it may seem. In fact, i...

Trail of Mohammad Ajmal Amir Kasab – A joke!

Who do you trial? Who does this? What is this all about? Is this playing with justice or is it just a mockery of the whole thing? Well, there are lots of questions and I find very less of answers to all these. Mohammad Ajmal Amir Kasab is the only survivor from the pack of Pakistani terrorists who attacked Mumbai on November 26, 2008 (better known as 26/11). He was captured while he was on a rampage killing scores of people and injuring hundreds, on that dreadful night in Mumbai. There was a lot of fuss in the last few months about him being a Pakistani or his age to be prosecuted in an adult court or with his captivity. Recently, the long awaited trial started and everyone is waiting to see what the court will decide on his fate. Ridiculous! What is there to decide? Hang him!! Simple… Well, I do not want to hang him without getting all the information from him and only after proving that the attackers were all from Pakistan and the whole incident was built up by the Pakistani Army, Go...

Dumb Indians?

Some more thought on EDUCATION. This was originally written by me on my personal blog... but i think this will go very well in this arena too. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The fundamental issue that India has and not easily solvable is average IQ being low. India's average IQ is 81, while that of most progressed countries is above 97. China surprisingly has an average IQ of 100. India being a truely democratic country, the government is represented by majority, and majority has an IQ below 70 (IQ distribution is vast in India). Hence you get a government elected by morons, representing morons, and full of morons. And since these morons govern justice system, education system, healthcare, you name it, a person with an engineering degree, or a doctor, or a lawyer from India on average has an IQ of 81 as well. While the requirements of bec...