Skip to main content

Did You Ever Love Me? Book Review: Can Rithvik singh turn heartbreak into a homecoming?

Did You Ever Love Me? by Rithvik Singh is a tender contemporary poetry collection about love, heartbreak, longing, self worth and learning to let go. Its greatest strength is emotional accessibility: Singh writes directly to readers who feel intensely and care deeply. The collection offers comfort without pretending heartbreak is simple, though its simplicity may occasionally feel familiar to seasoned poetry readers. Did you Ever Love Me? Have you ever loved someone so completely that, after they left, you were left wondering whether they had ever understood what they had been given? Not merely whether they loved you, but whether they ever noticed how much you loved them, how much patience you offered, how many small things you remembered, or how often you chose to stay when leaving might have been easier. There is a particular loneliness in that question because it rarely arrives at a dramatic moment. More often, it finds you while you are doing something completely ordinary. Yo...

4 thoughts on Gandhi’s Satyagraha and Non-Violence


While we are all are poised to celebrate Republic Day, it is the apt occasion to write about one of its most admired heroes without whose contribution the India could never become free and no colonized country become a republic in its true sense. However, there were, and still are many opponents of Gandhi who even tried to prove that the non-violence, as a method to fight British empire, was not only inappropriate but a downright blunder. Many people had doubts regarding Satyagraha or non-violence during Gandhi’s times. In today’s times of military trials, it is but natural to have doubts regarding the relevance of non-violence. So, let us understand the full import of Gandhi’s Satyagraha, what it was not, and relevance in today’s time:

Myth: Satyagraha was for weak
It was the strongest weapon used against violent forces. He famously believed “Satyagraha is the vindication of truth not by infliction of suffering on the opponent but on oneself.” In fact, the very concept of Satyagraha breaks the myth that non-violence is an excuse for the coward. Nay, it even sketches a line between the active practitioners of non-violence and nonchalant, passive cowards. For, it is not the work of passive cowards to continue his fight for truth in the face of violent persecution, without raising a hand and without stopping a step. Satyagrahis would not just offer cosmetic sympathy. Apart from their active struggle against oppression, Satyagrahis would also actively participate in removing the social evils like alcoholism and untouchability and also achieved considerable positive results and support.

Truth: Satyagraha strengthened women
While the feeling of patriotism was equally shared by both men and women, the latter generally refrained from participating actively against the colonialists. Even those who were interested in participating in the struggle against freedom were restrained by social customs and more importantly barbaric nature of the oppressors. However, Gandhi’s non-violent Satyagraha offered them a legitimate, acceptable means to actively stand against injustice and persecution. The movement demanded community participation and thus offered communal support, more safety and encouraged positive peer pressure. Beside’s Gandhi’s liberal thoughts that broke the barriers of caste, creed and gender further encouraged them to come ahead and fight against oppression. Hence Satyagraha played a vital role in strengthening women.

Misconception: Non-violence is not relevant anymore
If the Gandhi’s non-violence was irrelevant in today’s context the militant countries of the world would have been ruling over it. On the contrary, many of them are largely being deserted by their own inhabitants. The victory fetched by bloody wars has failed miserably in bringing about a long-lasting peace. In fact, the reason lies in its very own structure. The violence is based on the foundation of fear. The victory brought about by violence is short lived and starts a vicious cycle of hatred. The defeated keeps on planning for revenging the defeat while the victor is more worried on strengthening the army to avoid such attacks rather than enjoying the victory. Fundamentally both of them lose.
Non-violence, on the contrary, focuses at burning away the pride and cruelty and rekindling the natural kindness. Hence there is no loser in that war. The Satyagrahi gains his self-respect while the opponent also regains the precious natural gift of humanity: Kindness.

Observation: Vital role of Non-Violence in development of civilization

Upon analyzing the human civilization we would observe that the most primitive ancestors of human were wandering hunters. Gradually they started farming. So, they evolved from being violent to many peaceful creatures (vegetable eaters). More interestingly, only after they started farming they finally settled down, villages were formed gradually and finally, the culture flourished. So, we see that for any kind of steady cultural development, non-violence is the key element. Hence, non-violence also offers a fertile ground for scientific, cultural and artistic development. 

Jitendra is a creative writer and a peaceful soul. Writing has not just his profession or passion. He admires writing for its therapeutic effects on the mind. He loves to visit the abandoned forts and national parks when he is not writing. He can be reached at worldofwords1970@gmail.com
__________

For guest article submissions at this website, kindly get in touch at orangy [dot] in @ Gmail [dot]com

Comments

Also read

"My cousin touched me there"

Note: When Tan suggested me to post this here...I gave it a thought. I felt he was right.  yeha I know in the election times ..people would be more inclined to politics. Well still..just give it a read :) For the first time when she came in I knew she is going to be one of my best pals. she was bubbly chirpy sociable and a caring human being.she was I felt my true copy. But what I felt wasn't true and I'd never known that trait of hers which never matched mine had such a reason behind it. She never liked to talk or be familiar to the opposite sex. I found this irritating but I just used to remember all her other traits which brought her close to me and made her one of the closest beings to me on this Earth. As she and I had got very close in friendship that we began sharing secrets which we never thought would come out of our mind. And I thought I understood her as I thought she was me. Then one day as we were alone in my room I asked her why she was so unfamiliar and irritat...

Did You Ever Love Me? Book Review: Can Rithvik singh turn heartbreak into a homecoming?

Did You Ever Love Me? by Rithvik Singh is a tender contemporary poetry collection about love, heartbreak, longing, self worth and learning to let go. Its greatest strength is emotional accessibility: Singh writes directly to readers who feel intensely and care deeply. The collection offers comfort without pretending heartbreak is simple, though its simplicity may occasionally feel familiar to seasoned poetry readers. Did you Ever Love Me? Have you ever loved someone so completely that, after they left, you were left wondering whether they had ever understood what they had been given? Not merely whether they loved you, but whether they ever noticed how much you loved them, how much patience you offered, how many small things you remembered, or how often you chose to stay when leaving might have been easier. There is a particular loneliness in that question because it rarely arrives at a dramatic moment. More often, it finds you while you are doing something completely ordinary. Yo...

Satyameva Jayate - Free speech

More than 40 people have died in the riots that have followed the killing of Swami Lakshmanananda in Kandhamal in Orissa. 5 people were killed and 47 injured in Mumbai when Jerry Falwell made some comments saying that the Prophet of Islam was a violent man and a terrorist. 12 people had died in Mumbai in anti-rushdie riots. There are more instances I can point out, but these stand out because of the scale and because of how related India is to last two people. Mr. Falwell runs a Christian ministry in US and Salman Rushdie, although ethically an Indian, had migrated to Pakistan and was a citizen of UK at that time. Of all riots that took place all over the world following the statement by Jerry Falwell and against Salman Rushdie, India was the only place with causalities. Orissa has been a hotbed of communal tensions between Hindus and Christians for a while now. India is the largest democracy which is more than 60 years old. Why then are we so undemocratic in our conduct? I will not sa...